Global warming theory, by definition, is not simply the theory that the Earth is slowly warming we are experiencing climate change but is the theory that mankind emissions, including CO2 is what is causing the planet to warm. Most of the media, and large number of scientists like to believe that global warming theory has been demonstrated, "It has been decided," as one French newspaper put just before an important meeting of world leaders and climate scientists. This is simply not the case.
A good number of people, including about 30 to 40% of scientists out there, I believe that the Earth goes through cycles where it is hot, and when it's cold as an ice age. During the decade of 1970 scientists warned that we were in an Ice Age, and in 2000, which were more confident that we were in a warm-up, which was to cause all polar ice melts, and put Florida under water. You may still say – yes, I know, which is completely uncertain.
However, I'd recommend reading a great article that was in the Wall Street Journal on Sunday, May 29, 2010, "Mining of the probe cold, hard facts – Scientists and Arctic ice to solve the climate debate, "by Robert Lee Hotz. In that article, which incidentally was brilliantly written, and I have to supplement the editorial staff of The Wall Street Journal with the author in particular, that obviously knows exactly what he is talking about – he explained exactly what ice core samples say, how they were collected, and why the data is fundamental.
Over the years, our kind of Internet-style think tank often discussed climate change, weather cycles, global warming theory policy, and dominance and manipulation of science in this regard. It I thought that the ice core samples can not provide all that care to learn about it, you can have 1000 years worth of core samples ice, what will happen to 1,500 meters, but do not say is that periods of warming may have melted much of the ice at a lower level.
Therefore, the rings during periods of warming would not be there – would not be the rings that are dictated by events, and the right climate cycle before the warm-up. And I think it should be noted, as these periods have been erased, because the ice has melted. Do you see there? In other words global warming theory obviously can not be proven, but will also be difficult to prove severe periods of warming on hundreds of thousands of years using only ice core samples. Please consider this.
Global Warming Definition
|
|
Energy Systems in the Era of Energy Vectors: A Key to Define, Analyze and Design Energy Systems Beyond Fossil Fuels (Green Energy and Technology) $108.06 What lies beyond the era of fossil fuels? While most answers focus on different primary energy resources, Energy Systems in the Era of Energy Vectors provides a completely new approach. Instead of providing a traditional consumption analysis of classical primary energy resources such as oil, coal, nuclear power and gas, Energy Systems in the Era of Energy Vectors describes and assesses energy tec… |
Comments on this entry are closed.