Sensible scientific debate has been overlooked in global warming conference of the UN?
This is an article about how scientists were completely ignored and left global warming UN conference in Bali: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2007/121207_scientists_shunned.htm There are serious flaws in the global warming theory, and many of the worlds best scientists are against it. There is absolutely no evidence to prove that emissions CO2 contributes to global warming, yet billions are spent to combat it. Any scientists who expressed concern about the global warming theory, and present the new evidence contradicts the theory, they are immediately ridiculed and ignored completely. The IPCC does not like anyone who goes against them because "Save Earth "or" green '"gets votes for politicians and make money. This is just completely wrong, is not it? Surely even defenders global warming should agree that the scientific debate on the subject should be allowed?
climate science is relatively new. The system ocean – atmosphere is not well understood and there is no dispute about what actually drives climate. The IPCC, which has based its policy on climate models (that predict disaster but you can not predict rainfall) has created a situation in which anyone who questions the controversy is seen as a heretic. carbon dioxide – or C02 – is presented as a contaminant, a substance that is killing the world through greed and mans stupidity. This is simply not true. Carbon dioxide allows living organisms to grow. C02 is also no evidence that climate is a driver, even when presented by the alarmists at it's current level of 380 parts per atmosphere million that pales into insignificance beside the water vapor to 10,500 parts per million. Climate models do not have water vapor. On the other hand, the "stick of hockey success, appearing in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth and blames climate change squarely on mans activities clears the Warm Period Medieval (PCM) and the Little Ice Age (LIA), both of which are important periods in the climate of the recent history of land and none of which were caused by man. We have a long way to go before we can really understand how climate works and obviously in our interests as a kind of caring for our world, but to me personally climate alarmism is counterproductive and fraught with lies and hypocrisy and, above all, totally bad science and political trickery.
Wine Maker & Polish Industry Face Global Warming Concerns
|
|
High Noon 20 Global Problems, 20 Years to Solve Them $4.99 In this age of instant communication and biotechnology, on this ever-smaller planet, what kinds of problems have we created for ourselves? How do we tackle them in a world where the accustomed methods used by nation-states may be reaching their natural limits?In High Noon, J. F. Rischard challenges us to take a new approach to the twenty most important and urgent global problems of the twenty-firs… |
Comments on this entry are closed.